Hannahst1130101007pm
Faculty Senate Meeting
11-30-2010
By Trevan J. Hannahs
The Executive Committee of the Faculty Senate revised the current incomplete grade policy Monday and sent it back to the current standing committee. The committee also approved a new procedure to the Marshall University student handbook in regards to the Grievance Procedure for Acts of Discrimination and Harassment.
Burnis Morris, Carter G. Woodson and member of the committee, said they have been working on the current Incomplete Policy for over a year now.
Senate Chair Camilla Brammer said, “We (Faculty Senate) were asked to come to combine all of the comments on the academic policy regarding incompletes and combining those, this is what emerged.”
Brammer, who also serves as professor and chair of the Communications Studies Department, said the document would be sent back to the Budget and Academic Policy Committee before being sent to the Faculty Senate Floor.
After the reading of the handout, a copy of the current policy, many members began to edit any grammatical errors they came stumbled upon while reading as well as, critiquing the overall content of the policy.
When asked by a committee member whether a definition of the idea of “Good Standing” Bernice Bullock, secretary of the Faculty Senate, said, “There is no definition.”
After the question, other members said the idea of “Good Standing” is when a student has a GPA of 2.0 or higher but none gave any documentation to what they said about the definition.
The second agenda item discussed briefly was the Grievance Procedure for Acts of Discrimination and Harassment. Because the policy underwent the same procedure of approval as the current Incomplete Policy and was approved, the majority of the members agreed the new procedure was ready to be publicized.
Brammer said the meeting time might have set a record. The meeting lasted approximately 35 to 40 minutes.
--30-